In 2011, the NBA went into a labor lockout, with the NBA season threatened by a delay. That meant NBA players were going to be sitting on the sidelines waiting for a new contract to get sorted out, and some of the most talented, greatest athletes in the world were without jobs.
As a result, Pete Carroll, the then-coach of the Seattle Seahawks of the NFL, decided to get creative and see if he could lure the greatest player in the league to put on pads and line up as a Tight End.
Get Scott’s article every morning
No spam. Just straight-talk career advice, every day.
That player? LeBron James.
Pete Carroll saw a 6'9", freak of an athlete, and thought that if he could get him to come to training camp that summer, he could harness his athletic ability and make him a two-sport athlete. While it was fun for a while to debate and discuss it, James ultimately decided it was in his best interest to wait for the lockout to end and return to the hardwood.
It leaves you wondering what could have happened, though, if James would have put on a Seahawks jersey. Could he have made the jump to the NFL? Would his athleticism have crossed over into another league?
Less than a handful of guys have played across two leagues and had real success, including names like Deion Sanders, Bo Jackson, Brian Jordan, and Danny Ainge. Playing in two professional sports is one of the most impressive athletic feats you could do, and if anyone could have pulled it off, it would have been LeBron James.
The part that matters, though, is that if LeBron James had tried football and failed, it would not have meant he was suddenly less talented. It would not have erased anything he had accomplished in basketball. It would have only meant that being extraordinary in one environment does not guarantee you will be extraordinary in another.
Sometimes you are not failing. Sometimes you are just learning which field you were actually built to play on.
We have a hard time separating those things in our own careers. We assume that if we are smart, experienced, hardworking, and capable, then success should follow us everywhere we go. New company, new boss, new industry, new role, it should all work because we know what we are capable of. Then it does not, and instead of questioning the environment, the fit, the timing, or the circumstances, we question ourselves.
You can be incredibly talented and still struggle in the wrong system. You can be a great leader and land inside a culture that does not value your style. You can be an outstanding salesperson and inherit a product nobody wants to buy. You can be a strong operator and work for an executive who changes direction every six weeks. Your ability matters, but it is never the only variable.
That does not mean you avoid accountability or blame everything around you. You still have to look honestly at where you fell short, what you could have handled differently, and what you need to improve. But there is a massive difference between saying, "I struggled in this situation," and saying, "I am a failure." One is an outcome you can learn from. The other is an identity you carry with you.
LeBron could have walked onto an NFL field, dropped passes, missed blocks, struggled with the playbook, and gotten cut before the season started. None of that would have made him less than one of the greatest basketball players who ever lived. It would have simply shown that talent does not transfer perfectly, greatness is often specific, and even the best people in the world can look ordinary when they are standing in the wrong arena.
Remember that the next time your career does not go the way you expected. A role not working out does not erase your ability. A bad year does not cancel out the good ones. A layoff, missed promotion, failed project, or difficult transition is not a final ruling on who you are. Sometimes you are not failing. Sometimes you are just learning which field you were actually built to play on.